Can we prevent the “Tragedy
of the Commons”?
Two factors are crucial for project success and therefore guide
the introduction of community-based natural resource management
(CBNRM) and related donor support: the willingness of local people
to contribute to improved management and protection of natural resources
and their capacity to do so.
Also in the community forestry legislation these two conditions
are decisive for the official transfer of use rights and the empowerment
of local communities by the Minister of Agriculture, Water and Forestry.
While capacities and skills can be developed through education,
training and experience, the willingness to act is much harder to
achieve, especially with regard to natural resource management.
Whether or not somebody is willing to do something usually depends
on his or her perception of the need to do it and the benefits
to be expected. Nobody will dispute that if you are sick you need
medicine and from buying and taking it you expect the benefit
of a speedy recovery.
To apply this principle to CBNRM, however, requires awareness
and understanding of the problem, for example the destructive
nature of frequent bush fires, but also clear incentives to do
something about it. One may ask: Why should I fight fires, report
illegal logging activities, control my cattle to prevent over-grazing
and so on, if others caused the problems and others are not willing
to do it the same way.
Here it is where we find the biggest challenge of community-based
management approaches, not only to be aware of, but also to be
willing to act on obvious problems that may not affect you in
an immediate, direct and personal way as is the case with a disease
mentioned earlier on. This is not only a problem specific to Namibia
or even African countries, this is known to be a problem of common
property worldwide and has been labelled by social scientists
as the “Tragedy of the Commons”.
The only solution to this dilemma is usually seen in rewarding
individuals for their contribution to the common cause. Financial
support of management activities through projects can provide
such incentives and is usually in high demand. But the level of
such incentives has to be sustainable. If money is needed to mobilize
a communal labour force, then eventually this money has to be
generated through management. Where resources and marketing options
are limited, so will be the money that can be generated. Accordingly
projects have to balance the need for financial support of local
people against the income potential of the current resource basis.
While higher initial investments are needed to establish effective
management sytems, such investments have to be gradually adjusted
to sustainable levels at later stages.
When discussing money issues, other CBNRM benefits are often overlooked.
What about the power to control resource use, the power to sustain
the availability of important natural resources for a particular
community? With community forests communities cannot only generate
money, they can protect grazing areas from over-utilization, allow
or restrict resource access to ‘outsiders’, enhance
availability and productivity of wood and non-wood resources,
protect habitats for valuable game and wildlife species and can
obtain skills and capacities that are valuable far beyond forest
management practises.
|